The Fifth Elephant 2019

Gathering of 1000+ practitioners from the data ecosystem

Tickets

Automatic Accuracy and Compliance

Submitted by Kritika Upadhyay (@kritikaupadhyay) on Saturday, 15 June 2019


Preview video

Session type: Short talk of 20 mins

Abstract

This paper is written for an audience with prior or limited experience on Identity and Access Management, focused more on access provisioning and audit coordinations towards compliance and other regulatory requirements.Access provisioning (APS) is divided into four phases: formation of the APS team, stabilizing the team, automating processes and merging compliance requirements onto the database of the APS team. The team was formed to hire and train/coach resources and transfer knowledge from the vendor organization. Stabilizing focused on improving service level metrics and processes for better customer experience. Automating processes addresses the many processes that have been automated to avoid manual intervention. The final phase is the inclusion of compliance requirements, with minimal intervention from auditors and APS team members.

Outline

Audience
Introduction
Provisioning and stabilizing
Provisioning and automation
Provisioning and metrics
Provisioning and compliance
Benefits of automation

Speaker bio

Kritika is an Information Security professional with 5 years of experience in the Identity and Access Management domain. She has demonstrated comprehensive expertise as a part of the IAG services team, converging on Access Provisioning services. Kritika pursued her Masters in Information Security and Cyber Laws and is skilled on ITIL Foundation. She is also an ISO 27001 Lead Auditor.

Slides

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ebf8xTa239bCECstiojUHrxUj-fDmi4Q/view?usp=sharing

Preview video

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FMaP8zx26e_tFrenRKaJ4kQez7Z6M_aR/view?usp=sharing

Comments

  • Abhishek Balaji (@booleanbalaji) Reviewer 5 months ago

    Hi Kritika,

    Thank you for submitting a proposal. We need to see more detailed content in your slides to evaluate your proposal. Your slides must cover the following:

    • Problem statement/context, which the audience can relate to and understand. The problem statement has to be a problem (based on this context) that can be generalized for all.
    • What were the tools/frameworks available in the market to solve this problem? How did you evaluate these, and what metrics did you use for the evaluation? Why did you pick the option that you did?
    • Explain how the situation was before the solution you picked/built and how it changed after implementing the solution you picked and built? Show before-after scenario comparisons & metrics.
    • What compromises/trade-offs did you have to make in this process?
    • What is the one takeaway that you want participants to go back with at the end of this talk? What is it that participants should learn/be cautious about when solving similar problems?

    We need your updated slides Jun 27, 2019 to evaluate your proposal. If we do not receive an update, we’d be moving your proposal for evaluation under a future event.

Login with Twitter or Google to leave a comment